Amendment to Schedule 8 tabled by Lord Mackay of Clashfern, Lord Craig of Radley, Lord Coaker and Baroness Smith of Newnham would place the same legal responsibility to have “due regard” to the Armed Forces Covenant on central government as the Bill currently requires of local authorities and other public bodies.
LGA view
Currently the new duty will only apply to councils and other limited public bodies delivering housing, health and education. We support the extension of the due regard duty to central government as an important partner supporting our Armed Forces Communities. Central government also determines much of the funding for local public bodies that are subject to the duty and issues national guidance that will affect the extent to which public bodies are able to fulfil that duty.
Amendment to Schedule 8 tabled by Lord Coaker would extend the scope of the duty to adult social care.
LGA view
While we are supportive of the Bill and this amendment, we are concerned about the potential resource implications the new duty may have on councils, including already overstretched adult social care services. Whilst many councils are already leading comprehensive approaches to local Covenant delivery, and there is learning to draw upon from other similar duties, some councils may incur additional costs to get ready for and implement the new duty. It is important that new burdens costs that may arise from implementing the duty are kept under review and fully funded by government. We support the Ministry of Defence’s commitment to review potential new burdens costs for councils one year after the new statutory duty starts.
Amendment to Schedule 8 tabled by Baroness Goldie would require draft guidance to be laid before Parliament
LGA view
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) is working positively with the LGA and councils on the development of the statutory guidance that would underpin the duty to have due regard. The guidance is an opportunity to embed a shared approach that will build upon what councils and local partners have already achieved, provide clarity about the scope of the statutory duty, further detail about what the duty means in practice and its implications for partnership working, recognise local flexibility to deliver Covenant pledges and support innovative approaches.
We look forward to this partnership approach continuing as the guidance is further developed. It is important that councils have sufficient time after the publication of the statutory guidance to finalise local implementation plans, including for frontline staff, before the duty comes into force.