This section contains analysis of the full results from the survey.
Public health funeral provision
Respondents were asked how many public health funerals their council had carried out over the last four years. They were also asked to provide this information broken down into two age bands, 16 to 64 years olds, and those aged 65 and over. The responses to this question were used to estimate the overall number of public health funerals across England, by assigning the number of the most similar available council to each council which did not participate in the survey or answer this question.
In the 2022/23 financial year, there were an estimated 4,400 public health funerals carried out by councils in England. This was an increase of around 500 from the estimated figure for 2021/22 (3,900) - see Table 3. This was broken down into an estimated 1,700 public health funerals carried out for those aged between 16 to 64 years old, and 2,600 for those aged 65 and over.
On average there were 15 public health funerals carried out per council in 2022/23, an increase of two funerals per council from 13 in 2021/22. This included an average of six public health funerals per council for those aged between 16 and 64 in 2022/23, compared to five the year before (2021/22). For those aged 65+ in 2022/23 there were nine public health funerals on average per council, compared to eight the year before (2021/22).
Table 3: How many public health funerals did your local authority carry out over the last four financial years? (all councils)
|
2019/20
|
2020/21
|
2021/22
|
2022/23
|
Estimated England Total |
3800
|
4200
|
3900
|
4400
|
16-64 year olds |
1600
|
1600
|
1600
|
1700
|
65+ |
2200
|
2600
|
2300
|
2600
|
Total per council (average) |
13
|
14
|
13
|
15
|
16-64 year olds – per council (average) |
5
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
65+ per council (average) |
7
|
9
|
8
|
9
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (102). Note: estimated numbers for England have been rounded to the nearest hundred. This may cause the figures to not add up precisely to the total.
Table 4 shows the data for district councils. There were an estimated 1,300 public health funerals among district councils in 2022/23, an increase of 300 (1,000) funerals compared with 2021/22. When looking at the data broken down by age, in 2022/23 there were an estimated 500 public health funerals in district councils for those aged between 16 and 64, and 800 funerals for those aged 65 and over.
In 2022/23 there were eight public health funerals on average per district council, compared to six in 2021/22. This included an average of three funerals for those aged between 16 and 64 years old per council, and five per council for those aged 65 and over.
Table 4: How many public health funerals did your local authority carry out over the last four financial years? (District councils)
|
2019/20
|
2020/21
|
2021/22
|
2022/23
|
Estimated England Total |
1000
|
1100
|
1000
|
1300
|
16-64 year olds |
400
|
400
|
400
|
500
|
65+ |
600
|
700
|
600
|
800
|
Total per council (average) |
6
|
7
|
6
|
8
|
16-64 year olds – per council (average) |
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
65+ per council (average) |
4
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (68). Note: estimated numbers for England have been rounded to the nearest hundred. This may cause the figures to not add up precisely to the total.
As shown in Table 5 2022/23 there were an estimated 3,100 public health funerals in single-tier councils, compared to 2,800 in 2021/22. The estimated number of public health funerals for those aged between 16 and 64 in single-tier councils had not changed since 2019/20 from 1,200. For those aged 65 and over, the estimated number of funerals had increased by 300 since 2021/22 to 1,900 in 2022/23.
On average, there were 24 public health funerals per single-tier council in 2022/23. For Those aged between 16 and 64 the average number of public health funerals has been nine funerals, this has not changed since 2019/20 for single-tier councils. In 2022/23 there were on average 14 funerals per single-tier councils for those ages 65 and over.
Table 5: How many public health funerals did your local authority carry out over the last four financial years? (Single-tier councils)
|
2019/20
|
2020/21
|
2021/22
|
2022/23
|
Estimated England Total |
2800
|
3100
|
2800
|
3100
|
16-64 year olds |
1200
|
1200
|
1200
|
1200
|
65+ |
1600
|
1900
|
1600
|
1900
|
Total per council (average) |
21
|
24
|
21
|
24
|
16-64 year olds – per council (average) |
9
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
65+ per council (average) |
12
|
14
|
12
|
14
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (34). Note: estimated numbers for England have been rounded to the nearest hundred. This may cause the figures to not add up precisely to the total.
Respondents were asked over the last four years what were the most common reasons when carrying out a public health funeral. As Table 6 shows, the most commonly cited reason in 2022/23, at 62 per cent, was a lack of family or friends to provide a funeral. It was also one of the most commonly reasons cited in the previous three years. People dying without any assets or income with no family or friends, and family and friends unable to contribute to a funeral, were the next highest reasons for carrying out public heath funerals. There were four ‘other’ responses, which were the same as options already provided in the survey.
Table 6: What were the most common cited reasons over the last four years for carrying out public health funerals in your council? (All councils)
|
2019/20
|
2020/21
|
2021/22
|
2022/23
|
Lack of family or friends to provide a funeral |
58%
|
54%
|
56%
|
62%
|
People dying without any assets or income with no family or friends |
53%
|
55%
|
54%
|
59%
|
Family or friends unable to contribute to a funeral |
52%
|
51%
|
50%
|
52%
|
Family or friends unwilling to contribute to a funeral |
36%
|
38%
|
39%
|
40%
|
Other |
2%
|
2%
|
3%
|
3%
|
Don't Know |
12%
|
12%
|
12%
|
7%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (104)
As Table 7 and Table 8 show, the responses broken down by district and single-tier councils. Among district councils, 57 per cent of councils said the most commonly cited reason in 2022/23 was lack of family of family or friends to provide a funeral. For the same period, in single-tier councils, people dying without any assets or income with no family or friends was the most common reason.
Table 7: What were the most common cited reasons over the last four years for carrying out public health funerals in your council? (District councils)
|
2019/20
|
2020/21
|
2021/22
|
2022/23
|
Lack of family or friends to provide a funeral |
54%
|
47%
|
50%
|
57%
|
Family or friends unable to contribute to a funeral |
54%
|
54%
|
58%
|
53%
|
Family or friends unwilling to contribute to a funeral |
43%
|
46%
|
46%
|
50%
|
People dying without any assets or income with no family or friends |
49%
|
53%
|
46%
|
50%
|
Other |
2%
|
2%
|
3%
|
3%
|
Don't Know |
9%
|
9%
|
9%
|
6%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (68)
Table 8: What were the most common cited reasons over the last four years for carrying out public health funerals in your council? (Single-tier councils)
|
2019/20
|
2020/21
|
2021/22
|
2022/23
|
People dying without any assets or income with no family or friends |
57%
|
57%
|
65%
|
71%
|
Lack of family or friends to provide a funeral |
64%
|
63%
|
64%
|
69%
|
Family or friends unable to contribute to a funeral |
50%
|
47%
|
39%
|
52%
|
Family or friends unwilling to contribute to a funeral |
26%
|
28%
|
28%
|
26%
|
Other |
3%
|
3%
|
3%
|
3%
|
Don't Know |
16%
|
16%
|
16%
|
9%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (36)
Nearly three-quarters (73 per cent) of respondents said that family and/or friendship breaking down was the most common reason why family and friends were unwilling to pay for a funeral in 2022/23, as shown in Table 9. The next two highest reasons were family and/or friends not being eligible for a social fund funeral payment (62 per cent), and family and/or friends believing it is someone else’s responsibility (24 per cent). These were also the top reasons for both districts and single-tier councils.
Twenty-nine ‘other’ responses were provided - however, they referred to people dying without any assets or income with no family or friends, despite these being provided as a default option.
Table 9: When family and/or friends are unwilling to pay for a funeral what are the reasons given? (2022/23)
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
Family and/or friendship breakdown |
76%
|
69%
|
73%
|
Family and/or friends not eligible for social fund funeral payment |
58%
|
66%
|
62%
|
Family and/or friends believe it is someone else's responsibility |
25%
|
22%
|
24%
|
Family and/or friends unwilling to take money from social fund funeral payment |
11%
|
7%
|
9%
|
Other |
27%
|
28%
|
27%
|
Don't Know |
6%
|
16%
|
10%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (107)
Just over a third (39 per cent) of respondents said that the COVID-19 pandemic had not had much of an adverse impact on the delivery of public health funerals. Thirty-one per cent of councils said that the pandemic had impacted the delivery of public health funerals a great deal or a fair amount. As Table 10 shows, just under half (49 per cent) of single-tier councils said that the pandemic impacted the delivery public health funerals a great deal or a fair amount - however among district councils, around half (51 per cent) of all respondents said it had not impacted them very much.
Table 10: How much of an adverse impact, if any, has the COVID-19 pandemic had on the delivery of public health funerals?
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
A great deal or a fair amount |
16%
|
49%
|
31%
|
A great deal |
1%
|
8%
|
4%
|
A fair amount |
15%
|
41%
|
27%
|
Not very much |
51%
|
25%
|
39%
|
None at all |
23%
|
13%
|
18%
|
Don’t know |
10%
|
14%
|
11%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (107)
Respondents who had answered that the pandemic had impacted the delivery of public health funerals a great deal or a fair amount were asked to specify how it was impacted. Twenty-seven councils responded to this question, and their responses fell into the following themes:
- family and friends worried about attending funerals for their own safety
- staff levels low due to sickness, self-isolation and working from home
- increased number of deaths
- due to safety measures, difficulty in accessing the deceases property and assets
- family and friends going through job losses meant it was difficult for them to help with paying for the funeral
- loss of contact with family and friends, due to social distancing and not visiting the deceased
- not enough cremation slots.
As Table 11 shows, half (50 per cent) of all respondents said that they felt the rise in cost of living had had an impact on public health funerals to a great or moderate extent. Broken down by type of authority, a higher percentage of single-tiers said they were affected to a by the cost of living to a great extent compared to districts.
Table 11: To what extent, if at all, do you feel that the rise in the cost of living has led to an impact in public health funerals?
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
To a great or moderate extent |
50%
|
50%
|
50%
|
To a great extent |
24%
|
30%
|
27%
|
To a moderate extent |
26%
|
20%
|
23%
|
To a small extent |
24%
|
23%
|
24%
|
Not at all |
17%
|
12%
|
15%
|
Don’t know |
9%
|
15%
|
12%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (107)
Respondents that had answered the rise in cost of living was having a great or moderate impact on public health funerals were asked to say how, 73 councils responded to this question. Responses were put into the themes below:
- more people cannot afford funerals
- family and/or friends unwilling to cover the cost
- increase in funeral or cremation costs has made them less affordable
- increase in those dying with no next of kin or funeral plan.
Families and friends
In this section, respondents were asked about their liaison with family and friends of the deceased. As Table 12 shows, four out of five (81 per cent) councils said that when planning a public health funeral they liaised with family members to a great or moderate extent. When looking at the data broken down by type of council, 83 per cent of district councils had significant contact with family members, compared to 77 per cent of single-tier councils.
Table 12: To what extent do council officers liaise with family members when planning a public health funeral?
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
To a great or moderate extent |
83%
|
77%
|
81%
|
To a great extent |
39%
|
50%
|
44%
|
To a moderate extent |
44%
|
27%
|
37%
|
To a small extent |
14%
|
14%
|
14%
|
Not at all |
3%
|
0%
|
2%
|
Don’t know |
0%
|
9%
|
4%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (107)
As Table 13 shows, 52 per cent of respondents said that family and/or friends were informed of the date, time and location of the funeral but could not make any amendments. Nearly a third (30 per cent) of respondents said that family and/or friends are informed of the date, time and location and could make amendments. When the data was broken down by council type, single-tier councils were notably more likely to provide opportunities to make amendments than district councils.
Sixteen ‘other’ responses were given, which have been put into the themes below:
- family (and /or friends) are put in touch with the celebrant about the service
- no family or friends
- direct cremation or burial, family and friends not informed about
- any additional requests are considered but at a cost.
Table 13: In what way do relevant council officers liaise with family members?
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
Family (and/or friends) are informed of date, time and location of funeral but cannot make any amendments |
54%
|
50%
|
52%
|
Family (and/or friends) are informed of date, time and location of funeral and can make amendments |
27%
|
34%
|
30%
|
Other (please specify below) |
19%
|
16%
|
18%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (88)
As Table 14 shows, almost two-thirds (64 per cent) of respondents said that they had allowed family and/or friends to personalise the funerals, with a third of respondents said they had not allowed this. Districts would more likely than single-tiers allow the funerals to be personalised.
Table 14: Are families and/or friends allowed to personalise public health funerals e.g. with flowers or music?
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
Yes |
67%
|
61%
|
64%
|
No |
33%
|
31%
|
32%
|
Don't Know |
0%
|
9%
|
4%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (107)
In cases where there are no family or friends
Respondents were asked when they had been unable to identify family and/or friends of the deceased, how often they advertised information about the deceased or their funeral on their council’s website. As Table 15 shows, 19 per cent of respondents said they always or often advertised information about the deceased or their funeral on their councils website, however, two-fifths (41 per cent) of respondents said they never do this. A little less than a quarter (24 per cent) of respondents said they advertised on their website sometimes.
Twenty-one per cent of district councils always or often advertised on their website, higher than among single-tier councils, at 15 per cent. Forty-seven per cent of district councils and 33 per cent of single-tier councils never advertised on their website about the deceased or their funeral.
Table 15: How often, when your council has been unable to identify family and/or friends, do you advertise information about the deceased or their funeral on your website?
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
Always or often |
21%
|
15%
|
19%
|
Always |
8%
|
2%
|
6%
|
Often |
13%
|
13%
|
13%
|
Sometimes |
14%
|
36%
|
24%
|
Rarely |
14%
|
8%
|
12%
|
Never |
47%
|
33%
|
41%
|
Don’t know |
3%
|
7%
|
5%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (107)
As Table 16 shows, a third (32 per cent) of councils said that they always or often used genealogical researchers to identify the next of kin when they have been unsuccessful in identifying family and/or friends. Thirty-seven per cent said that they had never used them. Forty-four per cent of single-tier councils said they had never used them, with twenty-six per cent saying they had used them always or often. Thirty-six per cent of districts councils said they always or often used these researchers, and thirty-two per cent said they had never used them.
Table 16: When you have been unsuccessful in identifying family and/or friends, how often does your council use genealogical researchers to identify next of kin?
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
Always or often |
36%
|
26%
|
32%
|
Always |
19%
|
20%
|
20%
|
Often |
17%
|
6%
|
12%
|
Sometimes |
21%
|
15%
|
18%
|
Rarely |
11%
|
13%
|
12%
|
Never |
32%
|
44%
|
37%
|
Don’t know |
0%
|
2%
|
1%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (107)
Costs of public health funerals
Councils were asked what elements were included in their public health funerals. The top five elements and services included in public health funerals were, cremation (93 per cent), coffin or casket (93 per cent), funeral director (87 per cent), funeral service (75 per cent) and burial fees (75 per cent). As shown in Table 17 these were also the top five elements and services when the data was broken down by district and single-tier councils.
Nineteen councils gave ‘other’ responses, which fell into the following areas:
- religious requests
- short service
- celebrant
- personal wishes at a cost.
Table 17: What is included in your council's public health funeral?
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
Cremation |
91%
|
96%
|
93%
|
Coffin/casket |
92%
|
95%
|
93%
|
Funeral director |
86%
|
87%
|
87%
|
Funeral service |
69%
|
82%
|
75%
|
Burial fees |
69%
|
83%
|
75%
|
Venue of funeral service |
58%
|
70%
|
63%
|
Right of burial |
46%
|
49%
|
47%
|
Music |
38%
|
50%
|
43%
|
Ashes urn |
38%
|
30%
|
35%
|
Funeral parlour |
26%
|
40%
|
33%
|
Viewing of deceased |
4%
|
21%
|
12%
|
Notice in newspaper |
11%
|
14%
|
12%
|
Floral tributes/flowers |
13%
|
7%
|
11%
|
Fees for maintenance of plot |
3%
|
2%
|
3%
|
Other |
21%
|
9%
|
16%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (107)
Respondents were asked to provide either the actual amount or an estimated total amount spent on public health funerals broken down over the past four years. As above, these figures were used to estimate figures among councils who did not respond to approximate a national total. As Table 18 shows, in 2022/23 councils across England spent a little shy of an estimated six million pounds in total on public health funerals. This was an increase of around £324,000 since 2021/22. District councils spent an estimated £1.6 million in 2022/23, compared to single-tier councils spending £4.3 million.
Table 18: Estimated total amount spent on public health funerals in the past four years
|
2019/20
|
2020/21
|
2021/2
|
2022/23
|
Estimated England -total |
£4,503,000
|
£5,096,000
|
£5,631,000
|
£5,955,000
|
Estimated district councils - total |
£1,287,000
|
£1,294,000
|
£1,372,000
|
£1,646,000
|
Estimated single-tier councils - total |
£3,216,000
|
£3,802,000
|
£4,258,000
|
£4,309,000
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (93). Note: these figures have been rounded to the nearest hundred.
As Table 19 shows, across England on average councils spent around £20,000 in 2022/23. The average cost per funeral in 2022/23 was £1,600, an increase of £100 from 2021/22. In 2022/23, district councils spent £10,000 on average, compared to £8,400 in 2021/22. Among single tier councils, the average amount spent per council increased in 2022/23 by £300 from £32,300 in 2021/22.
Table 19: Average amount spent on public health funerals per council in the past four years
|
2019/20
|
2020/21
|
2021/2
|
2022/23
|
Average per council -total` |
£15,200
|
£17,200
|
£19,000
|
£20,100
|
Average per council – district councils |
£7,800
|
£7,900
|
£8,400
|
£10,000
|
Average per council – single-tier councils |
£24,400
|
£28,800
|
£32,300
|
£32,600
|
Average cost per funeral -total |
£1,200
|
£1,300
|
£1,500
|
£1,600
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (93). Note: these figures have been rounded to the nearest hundred.
Respondents were asked how often they had been able to reclaim the cost of the public health funeral from their deceased’s estate. Table 20 the data broken down by reclaiming ‘some of the costs’ or ‘all of the costs’. Eighteen per cent of respondents were able to reclaim ‘all of the costs’ all or most of the time or very often. Fifty-five per cent said they had been able to reclaim ‘all of the costs’ sometimes. Twenty-seven of respondents said that they were able to reclaim ‘some of the costs’ all or most of the time or very often.
Table 20: How often has your council been able to reclaim the costs of a public health funeral from the deceased's estate? (All councils)
|
Some of the costs
|
All of the costs
|
All or most of the time / very often |
27%
|
18%
|
All or most of the time |
7%
|
4%
|
Very Often |
20%
|
14%
|
Sometimes |
56%
|
55%
|
Rarely |
12%
|
23%
|
Never |
2%
|
4%
|
Don't know |
3%
|
1%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (105)
As Table 21 shows, 49 per cent of district councils said they were able to reclaim ‘all of the costs’ sometimes. Forty-eight per cent of district councils said they were able to reclaim ‘some of the costs’ sometimes.
Table 21: How often has your council been able to reclaim the costs of a public health funeral from the deceased's estate? (District councils)
|
Some of the costs
|
All of the costs
|
All or most of the time / very often |
32%
|
25%
|
All or most of the time |
10%
|
7%
|
Very Often |
22%
|
18%
|
Sometimes |
48%
|
49%
|
Rarely |
13%
|
22%
|
Never |
4%
|
3%
|
Don't know |
3%
|
1%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (68)
Among single-tier councils, less than a tenth (eight per cent) said that they were able to reclaim ‘all of the costs’ all or most of the time or very often, and 62 per cent of them said they reclaimed sometimes. Sixty-six per cent of them said that they were able to reclaim ‘some of the costs’ only sometimes, as shown in Table 22.
Table 22: How often has your council been able to reclaim the costs of a public health funeral from the deceased's estate? (Single-tier councils)
|
Some of the costs
|
All of the costs
|
All or most of the time / very often |
21%
|
8%
|
All or most of the time |
4%
|
0%
|
Very Often |
17%
|
8%
|
Sometimes |
66%
|
62%
|
Rarely |
11%
|
24%
|
Never |
0%
|
6%
|
Don't know |
2%
|
0%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (37)
Respondents that had answered that they had rarely or never been able to reclaim the net cost of public health funerals were subsequently asked how much they had not been able to reclaim. Due to the low number of responses to this question an average per council has been calculated. As Table 23 shows on average an estimated £30,000 per council had not been reclaimed by councils in England over the last four years. The average amount not reclaimed per council was substantially higher among single-tier councils, at £58,600, than among district councils, at £19,000, which makes sense given the smaller average resident population among district councils.
Table 23: What is the total net cost of public health funerals you have not been able to reclaim over the last four years?
|
Estimated per council (average) £
|
Districts (average) £
|
Single-tier (average) £
|
Total net cost |
£30,300
|
£19,000
|
£58,600
|
Base: all respondents (28). Note: these figures have been rounded to the nearest hundred.
As Table 24 shows, half (50 per cent) of respondents said that they always or often found it challenging to ascertain what funds were available in the deceased persons’ bank or building society account prior to carrying out the funeral. Compared to districts, single-tiers found it challenging always or often more frequently.
Table 24: In the course of organising a public health funeral, how often, have you ever found it challenging to ascertain what funds are available in the deceased person's bank or building society account prior to carrying out the funeral?
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
Always or often |
48%
|
53%
|
50%
|
Always |
13%
|
11%
|
12%
|
Often |
35%
|
42%
|
38%
|
Sometimes |
37%
|
35%
|
36%
|
Rarely |
11%
|
2%
|
7%
|
Never |
3%
|
8%
|
5%
|
Don’t know |
1%
|
2%
|
2%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (105)
Respondents were asked to share information on low-cost funeral options they shared. Fifty-four councils were able to share information, which fell into the following areas of interest:
- signposting family and/or friends to the funeral grants or payment plans available
- referring to websites of local funeral firms
- direct cremation
- services shorter or earlier in the day
- using local funeral firms.
As Table 25 shows half (51 per cent) of councils said they provided information regarding other options for low cost funerals.
Table 25: Does your council provide information regarding other options for low-cost funerals?
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
Yes |
52%
|
49%
|
51%
|
No |
36%
|
44%
|
40%
|
Don't Know |
11%
|
8%
|
9%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (105)
As Table 26 shows, 61 per cent of councils said that when someone contacts the council for assistance with a relative’s funeral, they would contact the service directly. Thirty-eight per cent of respondents said they would be contacted via a funeral director, and 28 per cent said via the registrar’s office. Three-quarters (73 per cent) of district councils said that people went directly to the relevant service, whilst 45 per cent said via a funeral director, and 21 per cent via the registrar’s office. For single-tier councils, 47 per cent said directly to the relevant service, 36 per cent said via the registrar’s office and 33 per cent said via social services.
Fifty-two councils provided ‘other’ answers; they have been grouped into the options below:
- via the coroner
- via the old people’s or care home
- via the palliative care hospice.
Table 26: When someone contacts the council for assistance with a relative’s funeral, how do they approach the council?
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
Directly to the relevant service |
73%
|
47%
|
61%
|
Via a funeral director |
45%
|
29%
|
38%
|
Via the registrar’s office |
21%
|
36%
|
28%
|
Via social services |
17%
|
33%
|
24%
|
Via the local hospital |
7%
|
25%
|
15%
|
Other (please specify below) |
49%
|
51%
|
50%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (105)
NHS Bereavement
Respondents were asked if their council carried out public health funerals on behalf of their local council. As Table 27 shows, eight out of ten (83 per cent) respondents said they did not carry out public health funerals on behalf of local hospitals, whilst 16 per cent said that they did. When the data is broken down by council type, single-tier councils were more likely than district councils to carry out public health funerals on behalf of their local hospital (23 per cent compared to 10 per cent in district councils). Nearly nine out of ten (89 per cent) district councils said that their council does not carry out public health funerals on behalf of their local hospital, compared to 75 per cent of single-tier councils.
Table 27: Does your council carry out public health funerals on behalf of your local hospital?
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
Yes |
10%
|
23%
|
16%
|
No |
89%
|
75%
|
83%
|
Don’t Know |
1%
|
2%
|
2%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (105)
Respondent that answered ‘yes’ to carrying out public health funerals on behalf of their local hospitals were asked if they had a formal agreement with them to provide this service. As Table 28 shows, two-thirds (65 per cent) of respondents said that they did not have a formal agreement, compared to 35 per cent who did. All district councils that responded to this question said that they did not have a formal agreement. Half (53 per cent) of single-tier councils said they did have a formal agreement, and 47 per cent said they did not.
Table 28: Does your council have a formal agreement with them to provide this service?
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
Yes |
0%
|
53%
|
35%
|
No |
100%
|
47%
|
65%
|
Don't Know |
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (15)
Additional information
Councils were asked to what extent their staff were familiar with the Government’s good practice guidance on public health funerals. As Table 29 shows, more than four-fifths (84 per cent) of respondents said that their staff were familiar with this guidance to a great or moderate extent. When looking at the data broken down by type of respondent, single-tiers answered to a great or moderate extent more than districts.
Table 29: To what extent are your staff familiar with the Government’s good practice guidance on public health funerals?
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
To a great or moderate extent |
81%
|
88%
|
84%
|
To a great extent |
32%
|
33%
|
32%
|
To a moderate extent |
49%
|
55%
|
52%
|
To a small extent |
15%
|
9%
|
12%
|
Not at all |
4%
|
0%
|
2%
|
Don’t know |
0%
|
3%
|
1%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (105)
As Table 30 shows, 63 per cent of councils reported having a webpage which explains what public health funerals are and how to access them. When looking at the data broken down by type of council, 36 per cent of district council respondents said they did not have a webpage, compared to 21 per cent of single-tier councils. Thirteen per cent of single-tier councils did not know if they had a webpage explaining this.
Table 30: Does your council have a webpage which explains what public health funerals are and how to access public health funerals?
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
Yes |
61%
|
65%
|
63%
|
No |
36%
|
21%
|
29%
|
Don't Know |
3%
|
13%
|
8%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (105)
Councils were asked to share any good practice with us. Forty-five councils provided examples of good practice, which fell into the following areas:
- procedure and policies: property searches and contracted services councils have with funeral directors and genealogists
- respect and dignity: handling deceased with care, family involvement and personalised services, for example religion, with music
- communication and support: keeping next of kin updated, offering support to families, communication between council and other parties
- cegal and administrative: estate recovery and registering deaths
- challenge and improvement: issues with resources.
As Table 31 shows, 79 per cent of councils said that the LGA could contact them for any follow up work regarding public health funerals.
Table 31: Can we contact you if we have any follow up work regarding public health funerals?
|
Districts
|
Single-tier
|
Total
|
Yes |
83%
|
76%
|
79%
|
No |
11%
|
11%
|
11%
|
Don't Know |
6%
|
13%
|
9%
|
Unweighted base: all respondents (105)