Visit our devolution and LGR hub for the latest information, support and resources

LGA Corporate Peer Challenge – Progress Review: Rushcliffe Borough Council

Feedback: 6 November 2024


1. Introduction

Decorative graphic featuring arrows

 

Rushcliffe Borough Council (Rushcliffe) undertook a Local Government Association (LGA) Corporate Peer Challenge (CPC) during Monday 15 to Thursday 18 January 2024 and promptly published the full report and an action plan.

Progress Review is an integral part of the CPC process. Taking place approximately ten months after the CPC, it provides space for the council’s senior leadership to:

  • receive peer team feedback on the council’s early progress against the CPC main recommendations and the council’s RAG (red, amber, green) rated action plan
  • consider peers’ reflections on any new opportunities, challenges and support needs that may have arisen since the peer team was onsite for the CPC
  • discuss any early impact or learning from the progress made to date. 

The LGA would like to thank the council for its commitment to sector led improvement. This Progress Review was the next step in this ongoing, open and close relationship the council has with LGA sector support.

2. Summary of the approach

Decorative graphic featuring arrows

 

Rushcliffe’s Progress Review took place onsite on Wednesday 6 November 2024. The review focussed on each of the CPC’s main recommendations: 

  1. take a strategic/corporate approach to programme and project management, building on and aligning with your existing corporate performance management function
  2. invest further in staff and councillor training; ensure councillors in particular take up mandatory, essential and other training, including that on councillor/officer roles, political awareness, code of conduct and other internal processes
  3. create further time, space, resource and capacity with your strategic partners to identify what could be needed in future regarding changes in the landscape that affect you and your communities, notably the East Midlands Combined County Authority (EMCCA) Development Corporation and Freeport
  4. further develop and align your capital programme with your economic growth strategy once you have agreed the latter for 2024/25, with clear outcomes for both
  5. use your respected position with all your partners to deliver further defined outcomes across the whole council
  6. explore options through your climate change action plan to maximise delivery of environmental outcomes across your strategic development and growth sites
  7. integrate climate change ambitions in all your service areas
  8. reduce the number of RBC values, eg to a maximum of five, working with your employee liaison group and trade unions
  9. build up your future, annual or mid-term, light-touch corporate strategy refreshes from community level to best understand and respond to your communities’ needs and aspirations for the future.

For this Progress Review, the following original CPC team members were involved:

  • Member Peer - Peter Fleming OBE, former Leader, Sevenoaks District Council
  • Chief Executive Peer – Scott Logan, former Chief Executive, Basildon Council
  • LGA Peer Challenge Manager – Vicki Goddard
  • LGA Project Support Officer – Suraiya Khatun (offsite).

3. Progress review - feedback

Decorative graphic featuring arrows

 

Of the CPC’s main recommendations, the council’s RAG rated action plan reports that 100 per cent of actions are completed/progressed. 

Overall comments

Rushcliffe has experienced and responded to much local change since its last CPC. This includes: elections of a new Member of Parliament for Rushcliffe and EMCCA’s first Mayor (both of whom the council is building further relationships with), further establishment of EMCCA since it went ‘live’ this year, and the announcement during this Progress Review of Nottinghamshire County Council’s (NCC’s) Leader resigning from that role.

Rushcliffe is the only Conservative controlled district council within the EMCCA region, and the council’s chief executive is leaving, with Rushcliffe recruiting to that post.

In light of such significant change, the peer team was particularly impressed with the council’s:

  • work already undertaken to progress all the main CPC recommendations
  • careful consideration of, and building on, these recommendations to best enhance Rushcliffe’s agenda, rather than just actioning them at face value
  • recognition of how to progress each main recommendation further, to get the fullest value out of them. Details of this thinking are outlined in this report.

The peer team’s key reflections on the council’s progress against each main CPC recommendation – outlined above in full, and shortened here for brevity - are:

 

 

4. Final thoughts and next steps

Decorative graphic featuring arrows

 

The LGA would like to thank Rushcliffe for undertaking this Progress Review. 

We appreciate that senior managerial and political leadership will want to reflect on these findings and suggestions to determine how the council wishes to progress.

Under the umbrella of LGA sector led improvement, there is an ongoing offer of support to councils. The LGA is well placed to provide additional support, advice and guidance on a number of the areas identified for development and improvement, and we would be happy to discuss this.

Mark Edgell - Principal Adviser - is the main point of contact between the council and the LGA, and his email address is [email protected].