GMCA has used the levers at its disposal wherever possible to create a more streamlined and integrated employment and skills system that can respond to individual and employer need. For example, with the devolved ‘Working Well: work and health programme’ budget it was able to obtain ESF match-funding, doubling the pot to £52 million – something that would not otherwise have been possible. Other examples including using local health funds to provide employment support to people with learning disabilities or mental health issues.
“We have been able to commission services that might not have made sense from the point of view of a single investor, but do make sense when you are able to pool budgets. Pooling budgets – or at least aligning budgets – is something that national government would be unable to do, but we can,” said Mat.
What comes down from Government are often pre-defined projects with eligibility criteria, making it difficult to join things up to make a coherent progression pathway for an individual. Being able to co-design projects to deliver the best local response to national policy objectives would create far more effective (and cost-effective) interventions. There is also a lack of joining-up between government departments, and even within the same department, to decide on the best collective approach to achieve an outcome.
A decade of austerity has had a noticeable effect on the capacity of councils, explained Mat:
“That has made GMCA’s systems stewardship role more important – it’s about how we support local authorities in terms of evidence, intelligence and data to inform their decision making, and also to do some of the ‘heavy lifting’ they would have been able to do themselves in the past.
“A large part of what we commission and develop is based on the idea of integration and person-centred approaches, which means that at a local level we need a mechanism to bring together the different agencies in a coherent way. However, pulling partners together and building a system together has got more challenging for our councils as their budgets have become more stretched. Government seems to recognise that integration and joining-up makes sense, but there isn’t necessarily the funding in place to do it."
And as Mat observed, access to information, data and intelligence can also hinder progress:
“Let’s say there is a high proportion of people on ‘Restart’ with mental health issues. If we know the numbers and locations, we can look at whether we can provide additional local support. But if we’re simply told ‘yes, there are people in Greater Manchester with mental health issues’, that is not useful intelligence.”